Interdependent Scheduling Games
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose a model of interdependent scheduling games in which each player controls a set of services that they schedule independently. A player is free to schedule his own services at any time; however, each of these services only begins to accrue reward for the player when all predecessor services, which may or may not be controlled by the same player, have been activated. This model, where players have interdependent services, is motivated by the problems faced in planning and coordinating large-scale infrastructures, e.g., restoring electricity and gas to residents after a natural disaster or providing medical care in a crisis when different agencies are responsible for the delivery of staff, equipment, and medicine. We undertake a game-theoretic analysis of this setting and in particular consider the issues of welfare maximization, computing best responses, Nash dynamics, and existence and computation of Nash equilibria.
منابع مشابه
A Compiler Scheduling Framework For Minimizing Memory Requirements Of Multirate Dsp Systems Represented As Dataflow Graphs
menting other scheduling objectives, such as the minimization of buffering requirements, in a manner that is guaranteed not to interfere with code compaction goals. We have defined a class of SDF graphs called tightly interdependent graphs. Schedules for arbitrary SDF graphs can be constructed such that each block that is not contained in a tightly interdependent subgraph appears only once, and...
متن کاملInterdependent Defense Games: Modeling Interdependent Security under Deliberate Attacks
We propose interdependent defense (IDD) games, a computational game-theoretic framework to study aspects of the interdependence of risk and security in multi-agent systems under deliberate external attacks. Our model builds upon interdependent security (IDS) games, a model due to Heal and Kunreuther that considers the source of the risk to be the result of a fixed randomizedstrategy. We adapt I...
متن کاملThe strategic advantage of negatively interdependent preferences in action-monotonic games
Investigating the strategic advantage of negatively interdependent preferences in action monotonic games, we derive equivalent criteria both for general action monotonic games and for the subclass of action monotonic games with spillovers. Examples demonstrate the generality of our findings, in particular that the strategic advantage prevails beyond the classes of superand submodular games. The...
متن کاملEvolution of Interdependent Preferences in Aggregative Games
We study the evolution of preference interdependence in aggregative games which are symmetric with respect to material payo¤s but asymmetric with respect to player objective functions. We identify a class of aggregative games whose equilibria have the property that the players with interdependent preferences (who care not only about their own material payo¤s but also about their payo¤s relative...
متن کاملPure strategy equilibria of single and double auctions with interdependent values
We prove the existence of monotonic pure strategy equilibrium for many types of asymmetric auctions among n bidders with unitary demands, interdependent values and independent types. The assumptions require monotonicity only in the own bidder's type and the payments can be function of all bids. Thus, we provide a new equilibrium existence result for asymmetrical double auctions.
متن کامل